Commentary by George Lemako The power-hungry prime ministers in Papua New Guinea have consistently denied development grants to the opposition over the years. This strategic blockade raises a crucial question: while the government can stifle the development initiatives of opposition members, what about the people and electorates these opposition members represent? In January, Prime Minister James Marape announced an increase in constituency development funds allocated to MPs, raising the total to K3 billion (A$1.2 billion) from the previous K1.8 billion. If delivered, this would provide K20 million to each of the 96 open MPs representing the districts, roughly doubling the current allocation. The formula for the 22 regional MPs representing the provinces remains undetermined, though historically, provinces received K5 million for each district, making Morobe with nine districts the largest beneficiary at K45 million. Understanding the nomenclature is key to grasping the scale of this funding. The District Services Improvement Program (DSIP) funds are allocated to open MPs, while the Provincial Services Improvement Program (PSIP) funds go to regional MPs. Additionally, the government allocates District and Provincial Infrastructure Program funds to the districts and provinces, respectively. The prime minister’s tactic of blocking or withholding the development funds from opposition MPs solely due to their lack of support for his government is alarming. This action hampers the development of Papua New Guinea and stifles progress in regions represented by the opposition. The consequences of withholding these funds are dire. Without proper funding, healthcare systems deteriorate, leaving thousands to die from curable diseases. Inflation exacerbates the hardships faced by the population, and poor infrastructure, including deteriorating roads and non-operational airstrips, impedes mobility and economic activity. The education sector suffers, with classrooms falling apart, a shortage of teachers, and overall degrading educational standards. Additionally, law and order problems spiral out of control due to the lack of resources. While the prime minister and his inner circle enjoy the luxuries of city life, staying in opulent hotels funded by taxpayers, and celebrating with expensive beer and wine, the people of Papua New Guinea endure immense suffering. The stark contrast between the elite’s indulgence and the populace's deprivation is a glaring injustice. Denying the people their basic services is an affront to their rights. The disparity in development fund allocation between government and opposition members raises serious questions about fairness and justice. Why should the government members enjoy the full package of development funds while the opposition is left struggling? Papua New Guinea's progress hinges on intelligent and educated leadership, not on leaders who prioritize their survival over the welfare of the people. The country deserves leaders who think beyond their self-interest and work towards the collective good of the nation. It is only fair that opposition members receive their full package of development funds, ensuring that the people they represent receive the services they rightfully deserve. Only then can Papua New Guinea move towards a more equitable and prosperous future. Disclaimer: This is the view of the writer. The writer does not represent the administrators and owners of the site.
also read Comments are closed.
|
Papua New Guinea Breaking NewsPapua New Guinea daily News updates Let Your Voice be heard: Submit your news articles, commentaries, letters , Photos, Media Releases etc to us on this email: [email protected]
Mining & PetroleumTop Links |